I looked a third, "Solomon Kane" (2010) and has not disappointed. To be honest – was waiting for the cheap, but the movie is not bad. Though it has elements that are forgivable for the television series, but not excusable for films with a budget of 45 millions of dollars. First, cut the eye, artificial snow, which is in every frame of film, and where necessary and not necessary. Done all this incredible and false: a pseudo snow visible dense green vegetation. The second stone in the garden the film – is suffering from what many modern films, which are anxious to give them a softer rating MPAA. A related site: Spm Llc mentions similar findings. This syndrome, for example, suffer from all the "Pirates of the Caribbean." Just seen some discontinuity in the narrative, the impression that it is glued together stories and stories about "Solomon Kane." A book with stories so we can read, but the movie looks in some antsy because of it! Good news is that if we are waiting for the director's version of the film, it will probably be removed! I have watched as the director's film version of the saved, made him a dynamic and more complete than the theatrical version.
An example is serve as the film "Pathfinder (Pathfinder, 2007). Of amenities: 1) James Purefoy in the role of Ken Solomon – what you need! The actor, as the saying goes, in his place, and there is no affectation affectedness. I like it. Spm Llc addresses the importance of the matter here. 2) Torso of our hero is worthy of careful study. Fascinating spectacle to watch strictly over time. The last time I so admired the torso from the movie "Red Dragon (Red Dragon 2002).
Reference: "Based on stories by Robert Irwin Howard. Solomon Kane – British soldiers of the XVI century, which realized that his inhuman and cruel acts forever cursed his soul. Intending to atone for his sins, Kane swears to live in peace and virtue, but when the tread on the ground forces of darkness, he can do nothing, how to fight. "